This morning on Twitter the question came up: What made you finally realize that God never existed? Here's my answer.
"I was in my mid-30s before I was certain. I realized that this universe we find ourselves in is nothing like the world described
in the Bible. Humans guessed wrong all the time about it. God was just another wrong guess, but like astrology, the belief itself was socially useful."
Before I elaborate, I must confess that I'm no expert. I was raised Catholic, but I was
never a good religion student. In Catholic school, I tried to believe, but I found religion classes baffling. My education was a
fiasco, because I had ADHD. I've spent my life catching up on years of learning and socialization I missed, but I didn't begin to make serious progress until the ADHD was
treated. By that time, I was fifty-years old. Now I'm racing the onset of old age to learn.
I'll support my Tweet above by saying one strange quirk the Bible's Yahweh character is he makes believing in him
the first requirement of avoiding Hell and reaching a blissful eternal life. This is all the more odd considering that he's
supposed to be all-powerful. Why would an all
powerful God have a problem with people not even knowing he exists? How
many ordinary people on Earth have that issue? With their very presence
being doubted? Furthermore, why does such a God need believers to help
him, actually vouch for him, saying they know something they really don't? An all powerful God doesn't have that problem, unless he's also fictional.
I know he demonstrates his power in the Bible, but that just underlines the fact that he can't do it now. Just as easily as write a book, a God who created this universe could move a black hole
into Earth's orbit and use it to saw the moon apart. His smiting and
miracle-making in the Bible actually makes a case against his existence; it emphasizes the difference between the real world and the Biblical one, making the the latter transparently mythical.
Also, books are written by people for people. A real supreme being wouldn't need a book to make his point. He also wouldn't need angels to carry messages for him, nor believers to preach about him. He has a serious existence problem.
People who originated, compiled and wrote the Bible had no idea how large and old this universe is. Therefore, Yahweh character they concocted is as small-minded as the barbarians who created him. He has a personality of a tribal despot who must constantly keep his people in fear to maintain power. His insecurities are out of character for a supreme being whose power can never be threatened. Yahweh is vain, narcissistic, cruel, demanding and obsessed with obedience and fidelity. He's also erratic, becoming unpredictably enraged about the slightest, strangest infractions.
God's creators had to make him more awesome than any over-king on Earth. So, they simply took every personality trait they'd ever seen in the most powerful people at the time. Then they pushed those up to 11.
Later, the Greek-influenced theologians promoted Yahweh from tribal tyrant with superpowers to the all-powerful, ever-present, all-knowing creator of the whole world. Oddly enough, they also later recast him as all-loving. In the meantime, humans learned our world is actually small part of an unimaginably large and old universe. We discovered, literally, all of creation didn't revolve around us and couldn't have been created for us. But Yahweh's powers stayed worldly, his disposition stayed petty. His existence problem made him onery. Rather, it made his believers depict him that way. As we learned more of the universe, believers tried to revise their concept of God to fit, but I think it's broken beyond repair.
In my humble opinion, this universe was never created. Yes, plainly, it exists, but it wasn't made by anything with mind, anything with a plan or purpose. Definitely, the Yahweh character never would've created this. I'll go as far to assert that no over-God humans have ever dreamed of would've concocted this universe. "Creation" is the wrong understanding of it, as creating is something humans do with a purpose. We imagined a supreme being with a mind like a human mind. We hoped we existed under its care as part of its creation, and our living in its creation, but that doesn't describe this universe.
Bertrand Russell in his book, A History of Western Philosophy, said Christianity is combination of Jewish scriptures and Greek philosophy. Most Christians see their religious origins in the Old Testament, unaware that much of their dogma and doctrine comes from the Greek philosophical thought.
Those theological conjectures were almost totally dependent on logic, reasoning and guesswork. They were impoverished in terms of empirical testing, information, and peer review. Historically, Greek philosophers always guessed wrong, and never corrected themselves. Other philosophers in other cultures failed just as badly. The only Greek thinkers who were even close to getting any physical facts about the universe right were the Atomists, such as Leucippus, Democritus and Parmenides. Yet, they were wrong on every detail. Parmenides, for example, thought motion didn't exist, that it was an illusion. Today, this is laughable. But the Greeks were important in that they originated questions that sparked thinking for two millennia.
The lesson here is that the most imaginative, most educated guesses made from a dearth of information are almost always wrong. Yet, the wrong guesses made then stayed around because they proved useful despite being wrong. God became an ad hoc way to regulate and direct human effort on a mass scale.
This raises the question: if ancients were so consistently wrong about every other thing in existence, how right could they have been about guessing there's a God? Who in the ancient world was in a position to guess right about such a thing?
In my thirties, I realized the entire Biblical story was incoherent. If you look at how many plans the purportedly omniscient, perfect God made, how terribly they all failed, and how each time Yahweh blamed and punished his believers, you'll agree with me.*
The Biblical story hasn't aged well. We now know there is no heaven in the sky for Jesus to have ascended to. So that didn't happen, or it was a cheap, staged magician's trick. Most likely it was the former, because lying about it a century later is as good as a magician's trick. I actually have doubts that Jesus the man even existed, but that opinion is too weak to argue.
Nevertheless, the important teaching was he would return very soon, within the lifetimes of his apostles. Except it's been 2,000 years and nothing of the sort has happened. The gospels said clearly that any further prediction regarding the time of Jesus's return would be wrong. Christians have predicted it, even though their scripture says it's foolish.
By my count, his not returning is the fifth plan of Yahweh's that's failed*. We on Earth await Plan F, but whenever Yahweh comes up with a whole new plan, first he punishes us humans for messing up the previous one; we're purportedly his greatest creation.
It's a relief that a supreme being with Yahweh's personality doesn't exist. Except Christians earnest about believing it anyway, and their honesty is corrupted by vouching for the existence of God, claiming they witness it when they've really witnessed nothing like it.
I'm not a Christian anymore because now that I've seen the empty throne of God, I can't un-see it. I think for the first time in history atheism is a tenable philosophical position. However, as true as it is for individual skeptics, I don't think it's true for humankind collectively.
We use fictions for organizing and cooperating. If religion could be said to have function for society, it gives people a certain level of trust in each other, i.e. it sets a minimal level of confidence and suppresses suspicions and acrimony. However, even if we need a powerful God-overseer, the need is completely irrelevant to its existence.
A consequence of this is that atheists are so distrusted. In a Pew Research poll of the American public, only Muslims are distrusted more than atheists.
Religion doesn't perform this ad hoc function very well, but it's important that people believe it regulates their neighbors, their families, their superiors and subordinates. It restrains paranoia and cynicism. I believe it's due to implied trust religion provides that humans are able to
intelligently organize into nations and whole corporations, while other
higher primates can't even come close. Marx was wrong: religion's not opiate of the masses. It's the placebo of the masses.
Therefore, I think it's necessary that atheists should swear to a code of conduct that's similar to Christian morality in all the important ways: i.e. don't murder, don't steal, don't bear false witness, and so on. Atheists should find this reasonable. Since we can't see what we don't see, there is no other solution I can think of.
Humans cooperate in such complex ways because we tell each other stories. Religion is only one of our practical mind games. It's not necessary for social cohesion that everyone believe in the omniscient God, but it's necessary that enough people act like that do.
The next question: if I know atheists are so distrusted, why do I identify as an atheist? I'll leave that for some other blog entry.